Analysis improves streamflow forecasting for river basins in the confluence of Asian monsoons and westerlies, indicating effective bias correction methods.
This study evaluates and corrects ECMWF precipitation forecasts (Set VI-ENS extended) over the confluence of Asian monsoons and westerlies, deriving a time series of correction factors for medium- and long-term hydrological forecasting. Based on a 15-year dataset (2008–2023), a dominant spatial and temporal bias pattern was identified: ~50% of the study area—in particular, the entire Tibetan Plateau—experienced overestimated precipitation, with larger relative errors in dry seasons than in wet seasons. Daily correction factors were derived using the linear scaling method and applied to distributed hydrological models for the Mekong, Salween, and Brahmaputra river basins. The results demonstrated substantial efficacy in correcting streamflow forecasts, particularly in the Brahmaputra basin at the Nuxia station, where the relative error in the total water volume over a 32-day period was reduced from 25% to 10% during the calibration period (2008–2020) and from 20% to 9% in the validation period (2021–2023). Furthermore, over 90% (calibration) and 85% (validation) of hydrological forecast events were successfully corrected at Nuxia. Comparable improvements were observed in key stations across the Salween and Mekong basins, with the combined success rates exceeding 70% and 65%, demonstrating the method’s regional robustness. Challenges remain in areas with weak linear relationships between forecasted and observed data, highlighting the need for further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tudaji et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: