Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pilot program improved prostate cancer screening efficiency in Lombardy, suggesting scalable digital health solutions.
Background/Objectives: Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among men in Italy, yet no national population-based screening program exists. In response to new European Council recommendations, the Lombardy Region launched a pilot in November 2024 to assess the feasibility of a digitally enabled, risk-adapted screening model. Methods: Men turning 50 were invited to voluntarily self-enroll through the regional electronic health record (FSE). A digital questionnaire assessed eligibility and family history (FH); eligible individuals (97,849 men without a PSA test in the past two years in the regional database) were offered free PSA testing. Risk stratification guided follow-up: men with PSA >3 ng/mL or a positive FH were referred to urology; others were assigned 2- or 5-year recall based on PSA level. Results: By June 2025, 8558 men had enrolled (8.7% uptake), 6072 were eligible; 644 (10.6%) reported a positive FH. Among those tested, 58.4% had PSA < 1 ng/mL and were FH-negative, 25.8% had PSA > 1 and <3 ng/mL and were FH-negative, and 15.9% met referral criteria. Digital triage was efficient and ensured care continuity without burdening specialists. Participation varied by local health authority (ATS), depending on implementation context. Preliminary data show a 25.9% reduction in urology consultations and a 35% reduction in MRI use compared to standard care, with no biopsy rate increase. Conclusions: The pilot demonstrates the technical feasibility, safety, low administrative burden, and potential sustainability of digital, risk-stratified prostate cancer screening. While participation was low without active invitations, early results support expansion with improved outreach. Lombardy’s experience offers a scalable, EU-aligned model for broader implementation across Italy and other health systems seeking to balance early detection with resource efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Azzolini et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: