Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Longitudinal analysis shows increased metapragmatic awareness of pragmatic markers in Chinese students abroad, suggesting enhanced L2 development.
Pragmatic markers (PMs) have been defined as linguistic constructions typical of spoken language which help interaction ( D’Arcy 2017 ). Previous study abroad (SA) research ( Magliacane 2020 ) shows that contact with the local community can enhance PM production. Nevertheless, little attention has been paid to how SA students recognize PMs and how aware they are of PM use. This aspect of pragmatic development is crucial given that awareness is a necessary step for any pragmatic production to occur ( Sánchez-Hernández and Alcón-Soler 2019 ). Against this background, this study analyzes longitudinally changes in PM awareness by eighteen Chinese students enrolled in English-speaking universities. The participants completed a pre- and a post-test version of the PM awareness test ( Magliacane and Sánchez-Hernández 2024 ), developed for the purpose of the study. The results revealed that, while abroad, participants increased their metapragmatic awareness of PMs, which contributed to their L2 pragmatic awareness development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Magliacane et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: