Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Automated framework improves retinal non-perfusion and foveal avascular zone assessment in diabetic retinopathy, indicating strong metric reliability.
We developed an automated framework for segmenting low-quality and non-perfusion areas in widefield OCTA images to obtain two key metrics useful for diabetic retinopathy (DR) monitoring: the retinal non-perfusion index (NPI) and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area. Using 170 images from 88 patients in the EVIRED cohort, we trained two models: Q-NET, which segments low-quality areas, and NPA-NET, which detects non-perfusion areas and the FAZ. Their combined outputs created a 4-class map to calculate NPI and FAZ area. Ground truth segmentations were established by a single expert (for non-perfusion and FAZ areas) or a consensus of four annotators (for low-quality areas). NPA-NET and Q-NET, tested on 29 images, achieved strong segmentation performances (Dice coefficients of 0.714 (low-quality), 0.781 (non-perfusion), and 0.879 (FAZ)). Some inter-annotator variability was found (mean Dice: 0.85 for low-quality, 0.683 for non-perfusion areas). Predictive accuracy for NPI and FAZ area was high, with R² coefficients of 0.97 and 0.63, respectively, with minimal underestimation and no overestimation. This AI tool provides reliable biomarkers for DR monitoring, supporting treatment decisions and medical decision-making by automatically analyzing OCTA images, and could be integrated into clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boité et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: