Extended review of relevance theory shows adaptations for visual and multimodal communication, suggesting further developments.
Relevance theory (RT), originally proposed by Sperber and Wilson (1986/1995), is a theory of human communication that is based on a general view of human cognition. In the classic version of RT, the paradigmatic example of human communication is a verbal exchange between a single speaker and a single hearer who are occupying the same space and time. In the book Visual and Multimodal Communication: Applying the Relevance Principle, Charles Forceville (2020) has two main goals: first, to make classic RT accessible to a wider (and non-expert) audience; and second, to adapt RT in order to account for other forms of communication beyond the purely verbal – namely, visual and multimodal communication. In the second half of the book, Forceville demonstrates how this adapted version of RT can be applied in a series of case studies on “static visuals”. In this extended review, I attempt to do justice to Forceville’s ambitious project and to outline the key concepts and terminology involved. In the discussion, I present some criticisms and questions, while offering some suggestions as to how adapted RT can be developed even further in order to account for moving images and film.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniel Barratt (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: