Performance of stacking ensemble neural network model improves burned area detection in peatland and non-peatland regions, suggesting L-band data is superior.
Burned area detection plays a critical role in assessing the impact of forest and land fires, particularly in Indonesia, where both peatland and non-peatland areas are increasingly affected. Optical remote sensing has been widely used for this task, but its effectiveness is limited by persistent cloud cover in tropical regions. A Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) offers a cloud-independent alternative for burned area mapping. This study investigates the performance of a Stacking Ensemble Neural Network (SENN) model using polarimetric features derived from both C-band (Sentinel 1) and L-band (Advanced Land Observing Satellite—Phased Array L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (ALOS-2/PALSAR-2)) data. The analysis covers three representative sites in Indonesia: peatland areas in (1) Rokan Hilir, (2) Merauke, and non-peatland areas in (3) Bima and Dompu. Validation is conducted using high-resolution PlanetScope imagery(Planet Labs PBC—San Francisco, California, United States). The results show that the SENN model consistently outperforms conventional artificial neural network (ANN) approaches across most evaluation metrics. L-band SAR data yields a superior performance to the C-band, particularly in peatland areas, with overall accuracy reaching 93–96% and precision between 92 and 100%. The method achieves 76% accuracy and 89% recall in non-peatland regions. Performance is lower in dry, hilly savanna landscapes. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the SENN, especially with L-band SAR, in improving burned area detection across diverse land types, supporting more reliable fire monitoring efforts in Indonesia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sudiana et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: