This observational analysis evaluates corrosion levels in reinforced concrete infrastructures, indicating high risk for some structures.
Reinforced concrete is a commonly used construction material in the modern age; however, premature corrosion of the embedded steel poses a significant challenge. This corrosion can lead to the premature deterioration of structures, including buildings, pillars, bridges, and drainage systems. This study evaluates the corrosion risk of fifty-three steel-reinforced concrete infrastructures (S-RCIs) in Butwal Sub-Metropolitan City, Nepal, using the corrosion potential mapping (CPM) technique. The CPM is a non-destructive, cost-effective electrochemical method that complies with ASTM C876-22b standards. It measures in-situ open-circuit potential (OCP) values of the S-RCIs) to qualitatively categorize the probability of corrosion into three levels: low corrosion risk (LCorR, i.e., <10%), moderate corrosion risk (MCorR, i.e., 10-90%), and high corrosion risk (GCorR, >90%). The findings indicate that the roof samples of residential buildings predominantly fall into the low-risk category, suggesting satisfactory durability. In contrast, fencing pillars, bridges, and drainage pipes show a high likelihood of corrosion, with OCP values indicating a probability of over 90%. Furthermore, the study emphasizes that structures exhibiting visible cracks, signs of delamination, and prolonged exposure to moisture are significantly more susceptible to reinforcement corrosion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Magar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: