Formulation reveals high encapsulation efficiency and cytotoxicity in lung cancer cells, suggesting improved targeted delivery methods.
Introduction: Crizotinib, an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase, holds significant potential for the treatment of lung cancer. However, its toxicities present a major challenge to its clinical use. To enhance the targeted delivery of Crizotinib to lung tumors, polymeric-based nanoparticles were developed. Methods: Crizotinib-loaded polymeric nanoparticles were prepared using a nano-precipitation method, incorporating stearic acid as the lipid, polyethylene glycol as the polymer, and Tween 80 as the surfactant. Key formulation parameters were optimized to achieve high-quality nanoparticles. Results: The optimized formulation exhibited a mean particle size of 142 nm, a zeta potential of -31.9 mV, an entrapment efficiency of 82.35%, and an in vitro drug release of 60.69%. These nanoparticles were then tested on lung cancer cell lines to assess their cytotoxicity, apoptosis induction, and anti-proliferative effects on the cell cycle. In vitro studies confirmed that the Crizotinib-loaded nanoparticles exerted targeted effects on nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) cell lines, showing maximum inhibitory effects. One year of storage at 4°C, stability testing demonstrated that the lyophilized nanoparticles maintained their effectiveness. Discussion: crizotinib nano-formulations were assessed for a variety of physicochemical and in vitro characterization . Five different formulations were designed and optimized on the basis of Particle size, Zeta potential, %EE, and in vitro drug release. Optimum formulation also showed maximum inhibitory effect on the cancer cell line. Conclusion: This nanotechnology approach offers a promising targeted drug delivery system for Crizotinib, characterized by small particle size, high encapsulation efficiency (EE), and optimal in vitro drug release.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naureen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: