This paper explores the legal standards governing environmentally impactful administrative decisions through a comparative legal analysis. It focuses on how different jurisdictions—namely Egypt, the UAE, India, and France—incorporate environmental considerations into administrative decision-making. The research emphasizes the procedural safeguards required to ensure transparency, legality, and environmental responsibility, such as environmental impact assessments and public participation mechanisms. The study also examines the influence of international legal instruments, including the Rio Declaration and the Aarhus Convention, on domestic administrative practices. It reveals that while France and India demonstrate advanced judicial oversight in enforcing environmental obligations, Egypt and the UAE adopt more centralized models with varying degrees of public involvement. Drawing from judicial rulings and international norms, the paper concludes with recommendations to enhance environmental governance through clearer regulatory standards, increased judicial scrutiny, and integration of international environmental principles into national legal frameworks.
Ahmed Ibrahim Ahmed Attia Khalil (Sun,) studied this question.