Algorithms k-ABIA and k-ABIA-3opt enhance solution quality for the traveling salesman problem, indicating efficiency gains.
The Angular Bisector Insertion Constructive Heuristic Algorithm (ABIA), though effective for small-scale TSPs, suffers from reduced solution quality and high computational complexity in larger instances due to the degradation of its geometric properties. To address this, two enhanced variants—k-ABIA and k-ABIA-3opt—are proposed. k-ABIA employs k-means clustering to decompose large-scale problems into subgroups, each solved via ABIA, with designed inter-cluster connections to reduce global search cost. k-ABIA-3opt further integrates 3-opt local search and ATSP-specific refinement strategies to avoid local optima. Both algorithms were benchmarked against GA, AACO-LST, and the original ABIA on instances ranging from 100 to 1200 nodes, considering solution quality, stability, runtime, and ATSP performance. k-ABIA-3opt achieved the best overall solution quality, with a total deviation of 28.75%, outperforming AACO-LST (44.86%) and ABIA (144.93%). Meanwhile, k-ABIA, with its O(n2) complexity and low constant overhead, was the fastest, solving 1000-node problems within seconds on standard hardware. Both variants exhibit strong robustness due to minimal stochasticity. For ATSP, k-ABIA-3opt further incorporates directed graph-specific optimization strategies, yielding the best solution quality among all tested algorithms. In summary, k-ABIA-3opt is well-suited for scenarios demanding high-quality solutions within tight time constraints, while k-ABIA provides an efficient option for rapid large-scale TSP solving. Together, they offer scalable and effective solutions for both symmetric and asymmetric TSP instances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: