Analysis reveals clinical factors influencing response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in tumors, suggesting effective prediction strategies.
Background/Objectives: We aim to identify predictors of response to ICIs in patients with advanced solid tumors that exhibiting a TMB ≥ 10 mut/Mb. Methods: Patients treated with ICIs alone at Northwestern University between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2020 were identified. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and groups were compared using the log-rank test. Wilcoxon rank sum tests, chi-squared tests, and Fisher’s exact tests were used for univariable analyses evaluating the impact of clinical and genetic variables on response, with significance defined as p < 0.05. Results: A total of 117 patients were classified as ICI-sensitive (n = 88) or non-ICI-sensitive (n = 29). Among evaluable patients (n = 105), the overall response rate was 34% with 14% achieving a complete response. Median PFS and OS were 8.05 months and 26.8 months, respectively. Higher PFS rates were significantly linked to the ICI-sensitive tumor group (p = 0.009), absence of liver metastasis (p = 0.015), and no prior systemic treatment (p = 0.001) in both cohorts. In non-ICI-sensitive patients, a TMB of ≥15 mut/Mb correlated with improved outcomes (p = 0.012). Mutations in the MYC pathway (p = 0.03) and the MLL2 gene (p = 0.014) were associated with poorer responses, while mutations in the TERT gene were linked to better responses (p = 0.031). Conclusions: Patients without liver metastasis, mutations in TERT, and TMB ≥ 15 mut/Mb are associated with superior response, while mutations in the MYC pathway and MLL2 are associated with worse responses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nizamuddin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: