This framework demonstrates equilibrium outcomes in social contexts, suggesting implications for economic disparity and governance.
This paper introduces Transdisciplinary Equilibrium (JX), a unifying framework that extends Nash-style game-theoretic analysis by incorporating emotional divergence, structural asymmetry, and anticipatory suppression into a composite social cost function. The model explains silence, conformity, and inhibition as equilibrium outcomes rather than anomalies. Applications include online self-censorship, economic disparity, workplace dissent, education, and governance. The framework provides testable predictions, simulation paths, and policy implications, bridging game theory, social psychology, and political economy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
AKIOHOTTA (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: