PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 19, 2025Frontiers in Education15 citationsOpen Access

AI as a creative partner: a PRISMA review of AI’s role in supporting creativity in education

View Full Paper
AUAlex UrmenetaMRMargarida Roméro

Key Points

  • AI supports creativity in education, showing potential to enhance the creative process while user agency varies.
  • After analyzing 111 research papers, the review identified 20 articles detailing five primary AI use cases in education.
  • AI commonly aids in brainstorming and adaptive learning, where user agency is maintained during creative tasks.
  • In some contexts, AI takes on a substantial collaborative role, potentially diminishing human agency in the creative process.

Abstract

Creativity is considered an important competency for personal and professional development in the current society. With the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in education, there is increasing interest in understanding how AI can support the creative process and how its usage in various contexts might affect user agency. Nevertheless, the specific role of AI in the support to the creative process is not clearly identified in the literature. To address this gap, a comprehensive PRISMA review of the existing research explored the different contexts and use cases for AI in support of creativity, identifying 20 articles from the ScienceDirect database after a systematic review of 111 research papers. The 20 selected papers identified 5 primary use cases for AI in support of creativity in educational settings including academic achievement, chatbots, diagnostics and evaluation, and literature reviews and frameworks. Of these use cases, the most common applications of AI tend to occupy a more passive role where it supports brainstorming, creative writing, and adaptive learning systems. In these instances, user agency is considered high as the user is actively leading the process. In situations where AI functions as a co-collaborator, human agency is reduced as AI takes on a more substantial role in the creative process. Domain and context also play a role in how AI is currently supporting creativity in educational settings. Generic domains support divergent thinking while more specific domains may reduce creative possibilities, but provide more structured support in the creative process.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Urmeneta et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af4546ad7bf08b1ead3154https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1602151
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Exploring the impact of ChatGPT on art creation and collaboration: Benefits, challenges and ethical implications2024 · 52 citations
  2. 2Acceptability lies in the eye of the beholder: Self-other biases in GenAI collaborations2024 · 35 citations
  3. 3Creative self-belief responses versus manual and automated alternate use task scoring: A cross-sectional study2024 · 11 citations
  4. 4Autonomy, Authenticity, Authorship and Intention in Computer Generated Art2019 · 189 citations
  5. 5A systematic literature review of game-based learning in Artificial Intelligence education2022 · 89 citations