Preliminary case-control study shows diagnostic utility of cell population data in sepsis severity assessment, suggesting potential benefits in clinical practice.
Cell Population Data (CPD), derived from next-generation hematology analyzers, is emerging as a promising tool for diagnosis of early sepsis. This preliminary case-control study assessed the diagnostic utility of CPD and its association with sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores and procalcitonin levels in sepsis patients. Seventy-two sepsis patients and 72 age- and sex-matched non-septic controls were enrolled. CPD parameters were measured using a Sysmex XN-1000 analyzer. Univariate and multivariate analyses, including PCA, PLS-DA, and OPLS-DA, were used to distinguish between groups. ROC analysis evaluated diagnostic performance. Spearman's rank correlation assessed associations between CPD, SOFA scores, and procalcitonin. Several CPD parameters-LY-X, LY-Z, MO-X, MO-Y, NE-WX, NE-WY, NE-WZ, LY-WX, LY-WY, and LY-WZ-were significantly elevated in sepsis. Multivariate analysis identified MO-X, MO-WY, LY-X, and LY-Z as strong discriminators (VIP > 1.15). ROC analysis showed MO-X (> 119.6) had 95.83% sensitivity, 73.61% specificity (AUC 0.876), and IG% (> 0.6) had 83.33% sensitivity, 80.56% specificity (AUC 0.880). IG count (> 40/μL) showed 81.94% sensitivity, 81.32% specificity (AUC 0.859); LY-X (> 79.3) had 93.06% sensitivity, 48.61% specificity (AUC 0.685); and MO-WY (> 752) had 84.72% sensitivity, 45.83% specificity (AUC 0.597). SOFA score correlated with MO-X (r = 0.40, p = 0.007), LY-X (r = 0.40, p = 0.008) and LY-Z (r = 0.39, p = 0.009), while procalcitonin correlated with MO-X (r = 0.30, p = 0.03) and HFLC (r = 0.40, p = 0.005). CPD is a promising, cost-effective biomarker for diagnosis and severity assessment of sepsis, but inter-equipment variability and current "research use only" status warrant further clinical validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mishra et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: