Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis compares romosozumab and vertebroplasty effectiveness in acute osteoporotic fractures, suggesting both offer similar benefits.
Purpose: To compare the 3-month outcomes of romosozumab and percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). Background: Vertebroplasty provides rapid pain relief in acute OVCFs but carries risks such as cement leakage and adjacent fractures. Romosozumab, an anti-sclerostin monoclonal antibody, promotes bone formation and reduces fracture risk; however, its effectiveness in acute OVCFs remains unclear.Material and Methods: This retrospective study included 84 patients with MRI-confirmed acute OVCFs treated between January 2022 and December 2024. Patients received either monthly subcutaneous romosozumab injections (n=52) or vertebroplasty followed by weekly oral alendronate (n=32). All received daily calcium (500 mg) and vitamin D₃ (1,000 IU). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and radiographic changes were evaluated based on anterior vertebral body height at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months.Results: Both groups showed significant improvements in VAS and ODI scores at 1 and 3 months, with no significant differences between them. Vertebral height changes were also comparable.Conclusions: Romosozumab-based conservative therapy may be a viable non-invasive alternative to vertebroplasty in treating acute OVCFs, offering similar short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: