Prospective cohort study finds narrow band imaging and endoscopic signs predict inflammation in dysphagia patients, suggesting enhanced diagnostic strategies.
Background and study aim: Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) is regularly used in neoplasia diagnostics though its use in assessment of esophageal inflammatory changes is uncommon. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of eosinophilic esophagitis reference score and ME-NBI signs in predicting inflammation using gastroscope with dual focus in patients with dysphagia. Patients and methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study in adults undergoing gastroscopy with esophageal biopsies because of dysphagia/food bolus impaction. Number of eosinophiles and lymphocytes were calculated per high-power field. We used logistic regression with forward stepwise selection to determine the most relevant predictors (endoscopic signs) of inflammation. To assess the predictive value of endoscopic signs for eosinophilic or lymphocytic infiltration we calculated sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. Results: In total 219 (71,2% male) patients were enrolled to the study. Most frequent endoscopic findings were furrows (121/219, 55%), positive NBI signs (106/219, 48%) and oedema (102/219, 47%). Logistic regression analysis showed that furrows and NBI signs were the most significant predictors of eosinophilic infiltration. Oedema was the only significant predictor of lymphocyte infiltration. Conclusions: Positive NBI signs and furrows were the best predictors of eosinophile infiltration, while lymphocytic infiltration was predicted by oedema. Given that NBI is already widely available we encourage the use of both white light and NBI in patients with suspected esophageal inflammation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Truskaite et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: