Response identifies flaws in Morozov's critique, suggesting the idea of ownership interaction is questionable.
Responding to Konstantin Morozov’s article, which criticizes the Entrepreneurial Theory of Ownership, I point out that the reality of the right to unconsciously interact with objects, on which he heavily relies, is dubious.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sergei Sazonov (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: