Comparative analysis reveals distinct gene expression patterns in Drosophila species, indicating adaptation without reliance on relatedness.
Identifying the factors determining the repeatability of adaptation is a long-standing problem in evolutionary biology. Addressing this problem requires both comparative analysis and an understanding of how genetic variation within species responds to natural selection. Latitudinal clines are a classic system for studying adaptation in many species, including Drosophila. Here we investigate male reproductive tract (testis and accessory gland) transcriptomes from Maine (USA) and Panama City (Panama) populations of three species that have recently colonized North America, a pair of close relatives, D. melanogaster, D. simulans, and a much more distantly related species, D. hydei. We observed strong evidence of parallel gene expression adaptation in the accessory gland, but little such evidence for the testis. This parallelism takes the form of genes that exhibit high vs. low latitude expression differentiation in multiple species, as well as between species correlations of high vs. low latitude log fold changes. However, the degree of parallelism among these species is not related to their relatedness. More specifically, D. simulans, which is very closely related to D. melanogaster yet very distantly related to D. hydei, shows much stronger parallelism for latitudinal accessory gland transcriptome differentiation with the latter than with the former. This, despite the fact that the reproductive biology of D. melanogaster and D. simulans are very similar and highly diverged from that of D. hydei. These results suggest that despite a signal of adaptive parallelism among all three species, the underlying selection responses are not well predicted by relatedness or similar ecologies, suggestive of idiosyncratic processes operating simultaneously with deterministic ones.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cridland et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: