Randomized trial demonstrated knowledge enhancement in paramedical professionals after transdisciplinary training, indicating effective training methods.
Background: The biopsychosocial model of disability and the transdisciplinary approach to intervention are promoted under the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Thus, there is a need to improve upon the understanding and knowledge of the medical and paramedical professionals in the use of the same. Thus, the study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of a transdisciplinary training module for paramedical undergraduate students. Materials and Methods: This study uses a pre- and post-research design with purposive sampling N = 107. Participants were divided into control and experimental groups, with the experimental group undergoing transdisciplinary training. Both groups completed a self-designed questionnaire before and after the training. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data, and a P value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant at a 95% confidence level. Results: The paired t test revealed a significant increase in post-training scores for the experimental group (difference = −238, P < 0.05), whereas the control group showed no significant change (difference = −47, P > 0.05). An unpaired t test indicated a significant difference between the control and experimental groups’ post-training scores ( P < 0.05). The experimental group reported a 99.5% impact score, indicating substantial knowledge enhancement. Conclusion: It is inferred that the transdisciplinary training positively influenced the understanding of paramedical professionals. These findings highlight the importance of integrating transdisciplinary topics into medical syllabi, enabling students to effectively navigate the complexities of long-term healthcare. By equipping future healthcare professionals with transdisciplinary skills, they can better address the multifaceted challenges encountered in their practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rangwala et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: