Retrospective analysis shows FRAX scores can be enhanced using AI-generated T-Scores in patients lacking DXA data, suggesting a new assessment tool.
Fracture risk is commonly assessed by FRAX, a tool that estimates 10-year risk for major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture. FRAX scores are often refined by additionally including femoral neck (FN) bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as an input. Rho™, a novel AI-powered software, estimates FN BMD T-Scores from conventional x-rays, even when FN is not in the image. Whether a FRAX score using this estimate (FRAX-Rho) can improve a FRAX score without a T-Score input (FRAX-NoT) has not been studied. We conducted a retrospective analysis of Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study participants who had x-rays of the lumbar and/or thoracic spine, FRAX risk factors, and DXA T-Scores acquired at the same time point, and follow-up fracture outcomes over 9 years. In 1361 participants with lumbar x-rays, FRAX-Rho and FRAX with DXA FN T-Scores (FRAX-DXA) had very good agreement in categorizing participants by MOF risk (Cohen's weighted kappa κ=0.80 [0.77-0.82]), which tended to be better than that between FRAX-NoT and FRAX-DXA (0.76 [0.73-0.79]). Agreement in categorizing participants by hip fracture risk was significantly greater between FRAX-Rho and FRAX-DXA (0.67 [0.63-0.71]) than FRAX-NoT and FRAX-DXA (0.52 [0.48-0.56]). In predicting true incident MOF, FRAX-Rho and FRAX-DXA did not differ in their discriminative power (c-index) (0.76 and 0.77; p=0.36) and both were significantly greater than that of FRAX-NoT (0.73; p<0.004). The accuracy of FRAX-Rho for predicting MOF (Brier Score) was better than FRAX-NoT (p<0.05) but not as good as FRAX-DXA. Similar results were observed in participants with thoracic x-rays. In conclusion, FN T-Scores estimated by Rho from lumbar and thoracic x-rays add value to FRAX-NoT estimates and may be useful for risk assessment when DXA is not available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Syme et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: