Review discusses how oxidative stress enhances trpm2-mediated calcium dysregulation in cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, suggesting new therapy avenues.
Cardiovascular and metabolic disorders significantly reduce healthspan and lifespan, with oxidative stress being a major contributing factor. Oxidative stress, marked by elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS), disrupts cellular and systemic functions. One proposed mechanism involves TRPM2 (Transient Receptor Potential Melastatin2)-dependent Ca2+ dysregulation. These channels, activated by ROS (via ADP-ribose), not only respond to ROS but also amplify it, creating a self-sustaining cycle. Recent studies suggest that TRPM2 activation triggers a cascade of signals from intracellular organelles, enhancing ROS production and affecting cell physiology and viability. This review examines the role of TRPM2 channels in oxidative stress-associated cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. Oxidative stress induces TRPM2-mediated Ca2+ influx, leading to lysosomal damage and the release of Zn2+ from lysosomal stores to the mitochondria. In mitochondria, Zn2+ facilitates electron leakage from respiratory complexes, reducing membrane potential, increasing ROS production, and accelerating mitochondrial degradation. Excess ROS activates PARP1 in the nucleus, releasing ADP-ribose, a TRPM2 agonist, thus perpetuating the cycle. Lysosomes act as Ca2+-sensitive signalling platforms, delivering toxic Zn2+ signals to mitochondria. This represents a paradigm shift, proposing that the toxic effects of Ca2+ on mitochondria are not direct, but are instead mediated by lysosomes and subsequent Zn2+ release. This cycle exhibits a ‘domino’ effect, causing sequential and progressive decline in the function of lysosomes, mitochondria, and the nucleus—hallmarks of ageing and oxidative stress-related cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. These insights could lead to new therapeutic strategies for addressing the widespread issue of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
AlAhmad et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: