Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This legal analysis examines access to justice for immigrants in Brazil, highlighting fundamental rights and constitutional protections.
This article aims to analyze the inclusion of immigrants within the context of Brazilian citizenship. To this end, a comparative study is conducted between the Brazilian legal reality and Friedrich Müller’s theory concerning the definition of “people,” with the objective of identifying which subjects effectively enjoy access to justice in the country. The hypothesis is that, under the Brazilian legal system, immigrants are holders of fundamental rights and guarantees, and are therefore protected by the Federal Constitution. Methodologically, the research adopts inductive reasoning, with a legal-diagnostic approach, employing bibliographic and documentary research techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neto et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: