PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 19, 2025Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences29 citationsOpen Access

Sparse autoencoders uncover biologically interpretable features in protein language model representations

View Full Paper
OGOnkar Singh GujralMBMihir BafnaEAEric J. Alm

Key Points

  • Sparse autoencoders effectively extract biologically interpretable features from protein language models, aiding understandability.
  • Features obtained are closely associated with Gene Ontology terms, indicating their biological significance and organizations.
  • Analysis utilized unsupervised learning methods, leveraging sparse autoencoders and transcoders from natural language processing.
  • These findings enhance the interpretability of models, paving the way for safer and more trustworthy applications in biological fields.

Abstract

Foundation models in biology-particularly protein language models (PLMs)-have enabled ground-breaking predictions in protein structure, function, and beyond. However, the "black-box" nature of these representations limits transparency and explainability, posing challenges for human-AI collaboration and leaving open questions about their human-interpretable features. Here, we leverage sparse autoencoders (SAEs) and a variant, transcoders, from natural language processing to extract, in a completely unsupervised fashion, interpretable sparse features present in both protein-level and amino acid (AA)-level representations from ESM2, a popular PLM. Unlike other approaches such as training probes for features, the extraction of features by the SAE is performed without any supervision. We find that many sparse features extracted from SAEs trained on protein-level representations are tightly associated with Gene Ontology (GO) terms across all levels of the GO hierarchy. We also use Anthropic's Claude to automate the interpretation of sparse features for both protein-level and AA-level representations and find that many of these features correspond to specific protein families and functions such as the NAD Kinase, IUNH, and the PTH family, as well as proteins involved in methyltransferase activity and in olfactory and gustatory sensory perception. We show that sparse features are more interpretable than ESM2 neurons across all our trained SAEs and transcoders. These findings demonstrate that SAEs offer a promising unsupervised approach for disentangling biologically relevant information present in PLM representations, thus aiding interpretability. This work opens the door to safety, trust, and explainability of PLMs and their applications, and paves the way to extracting meaningful biological insights across increasingly powerful models in the life sciences.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gujral et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af475aad7bf08b1ead4180https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2506316122
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Interpreting Attention Layer Outputs with Sparse Autoencoders2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuits2024 · 6 citations
  3. 3Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoders2024 · 10 citations
  4. 4From Mechanistic Interpretability to Mechanistic Biology: Training, Evaluating, and Interpreting Sparse Autoencoders on Protein Language Models2025 · 22 citations
  5. 5Governance Architecture for Neural Network Superposition: A Structural Solution to Hallucination via Routing and Interference Filtering2022 · 48 citations