Observational analysis shows higher short-window returns in emerging growth companies under à la carte regulations, suggesting increased investment in R&D.
Compared with “prix fixe” mandates, “à la carte” securities regulations enable local optimization and allow firms to reallocate corporate resources from public reporting to company building. Utilizing a rare retroactive application in securities regulation, we examine the real effects of a shift from a prix fixe to an à la carte regime. Upon the enactment of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, retroactivated emerging growth companies (EGCs) report higher short-window returns than control firms. During the period when the à la carte regulation applies, retroactivated EGCs spend more on research and development (R&D) and create more jobs than control firms. Once the à la carte regime expires, EGCs reduce R&D spending and hiring. In the cross-section, retroactivated EGCs that more frequently elect to delay adopting new accounting standards exhibit greater positive real effects and higher enactment-window returns. Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text. JEL Classifications: M48; O32; J2.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: