Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional analysis reveals high therapist adherence to cognitive-behavioural therapy techniques, indicating quality improvement in patient care.
Despite efforts to implement evidence-based guidelines, little is known about the quality of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) for depression, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder in routine clinical practice. The present study aimed to investigate therapist adherence to CBT, and related aspects of quality of care, from a patient perspective. In a cross-sectional study, 90 participants from 21 routine psychiatric outpatient units in Stockholm completed a web-based survey post-CBT. Participants reported a high degree of therapist adherence to CBT techniques and procedures (M = 3.02 on a scale of 0 to 4), with higher adherence for social anxiety disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder than for depression (p = .002, ω2 = 0.21). Therapist adherence was moderately correlated with patient improvement (τs = .37-.38, ps < .001). Participants reported a high degree of symptom improvement (M = 3.10) and treatment satisfaction (M = 3.38) and received a median of 15 sessions. Also, we found examples of excessive healthcare provision and non-adherence, as 17% far exceeded the recommended number of sessions, 80% had concurrent psychotropic treatments despite lower guideline priority, and 11% took benzodiazepines though not recommended. In conclusion, we found that CBT was delivered with high quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bergvall et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: