Analysis of seepage failure and fluidization mechanisms in gas-containing coal outbursts reveals critical insights into their causes.
This study investigates the mechanisms of gas-containing tectonic coal outbursts by modeling tectonic coal and gas as analogous to soil and pore water. Analytical methods from soil mechanics, specifically those related to quicksand and seismic liquefaction, are employed to classify these outbursts into two types: “quicksand type” and “fluidization type.” Their formation mechanisms are elucidated based on a fracture network model and a one-dimensional seepage failure criterion developed for tectonic coal. The findings indicate that “quicksand type” outbursts result from the continuous detachment of tectonic coal slices within the pressure relief zone under gas seepage pressure. The thickness-to-radius ratio of these coal slices increases with rising gas pressure but decreases with increasing coal strength and normal geostress. A larger thickness-to-radius ratio signifies a more pronounced granular characteristic and accelerates the development of coal and gas outbursts. “Fluidization type” outbursts occur when the effective stress drops to zero, resulting in a complete loss of coal strength. These outbursts represent a specific case of “quicksand type” outbursts and can be triggered by vibrations. The susceptibility of tectonic coal to outbursts is attributed to its low mechanical strength and the presence of dense fractures, which increase the acting area of seepage pressure and, consequently, raise the overall seepage force. According to this analysis, the depth of outburst cavities is generally less than the width of the pressure relief zone, which can result in delayed outbursts. This study enhances the understanding of quicksand and seismic liquefaction theories in soil mechanics and provides valuable guidance for predicting and mitigating coal and gas outbursts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: