This analysis reveals how increasing scale of liquid hydrogen tankers reduces transport costs, suggesting trade-offs in emissions.
Abstract As hydrogen emerges as a key vector in future energy transitions, liquid hydrogen (LH₂) shipping is poised to play a pivotal role in enabling long-distance, low-carbon hydrogen trade. However, the lack of scalable design frameworks for dedicated LH₂ tankers remains a critical barrier to cost-effective global hydrogen shipping. This study presents an open-source, weight-based techno-economic model to evaluate scale economies in LH₂ marine shipping. The model computes ship Capex and Opex costs across four scalable ships, 70,000 m³ to 420,000 m³, and is applied to routes: Karratha and Darwin (Australia) to Singapore (~ 2500 NM), Tokyo (~ 4500 NM), and Rotterdam (~ 10,850 NM) to show the model’s efficacy for global routes. Results reveal that increasing ship capacity reduces the levelized cost of transport (LCOT) by up to 55%, reaching ~ USD 1.14/kg LH₂ for long-haul routes (≥ 10,000 NM) and USD 0.272/kg LH₂ for short routes ( ≤ 2500 NM). A Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis identifies voyage distance, boil-off gas rate, fuel consumption, and fuel price as primary LCOT drivers. While larger vessels incur higher absolute CO₂ emissions, they offer lower emissions per kilogram of hydrogen delivered, suggesting a carbon efficiency trade-off with scale. The model offers a flexible tool for evaluating LH₂ shipping economics and environmental impacts, supporting global hydrogen infrastructure planning and policy design in emerging hydrogen economies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: