Analysis reveals trade unions in Norway effectively engaged in reforms, while Germany and Sweden showed limited involvement, indicating varying historical contexts.
How have trade unions in Germany, Norway and Sweden been affected by pension and workplace reforms made necessary by demographic challenges? The study shows that in Norway, unions were involved in both processes through tripartite alliances, whereas in Germany and Sweden, unions were largely excluded from participation in the pension reform process, making them unsuccessful in their defensive strategies. However, in Germany tripartite network building supported social partners and works councils locally in work life reforms; in Sweden, such work is largely through bipartite negotiation. The difference between countries seems to reflect their respective history of corporative alliances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kadefors et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: