Analysis reveals 10% divergence in income reports among EU households, suggesting need for data harmonization.
This paper studies the soundness and consistency of income measurement in the EU‐SILC, the main household survey of the European Union. By comparing income data collected at different times of the year, I show that households exhibit strong recall bias when asked to report their income for the previous calendar year. In particular, retrospective valuations are skewed towards respondents' contemporaneous income at the time of the interview. Given large heterogeneity in data collection schedules, this present bias has serious consequences for the stability, reliability, and international comparability of income statistics across the EU. Microdata analysis from 2007 to 2021 shows that income self‐reports diverge by more than 10% across sampling quarters on average, which seriously distorts official statistics, income trends, and poverty estimates in several member states. These findings call for the harmonization of EU‐SILC data collection periods, more extensive use of registers, and a thorough review of related EU social statistics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balint Menyhert (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: