This work demonstrates a new perspective on measurable functions, suggesting connections between complexity theory and approximability in computational analysis.
This paper steps beyond a standard overview of classical measure and integration theory to set a new framework for the constructive study of measurable functions and sets. It makes a trailblazing contribution by officially bringing concepts from complexity and computability theory into the analysis of continuous analysis, and doing so by developing "recursively approximable sets" and "polynomial-time approximable functions." These definitions give fundamental questions of measurability and approximation a new, computationally based perspective. The work uncovers a profound and unexpected relationship between the two disciplines, showing a set to be recursively approximable if and only if it is recursively measurable (Theorem 21). Its strongest but most unexplored result is a negative result (Theorem 24), establishing the existence of a straightforward recursive function whose level set fails to be recursively approximable. This result is as strong as a fundamental open problem of discrete complexity theory and yields new insight into the interface between continuous and discrete computation. The results of the prework form the basis of a new area of computable analysis, and it paves the way for further research areas such as an axiomatic approach to computational complexity on Banach spaces and L*-spaces and a complete characterization of recursive functions in terms of the approximability of their level sets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dharmender Kumar (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: