Observational analysis revealed shifts in microbial populations post-lettuce cultivation in reclaimed land, highlighting soil health implications.
Reclaimed land refers to artificially created soil formed by filling in seawater, leading to rapid ecological changes. Undeveloped reclaimed areas offer opportunities to explore previously unknown soil ecological resources. The Shihwa reclaimed land is an undeveloped area where microbiome-based studies of the microbial community have not yet been conducted. The soil from the Sihwa reclaimed land (SR, SL) showed higher pH (8.9), EC (7.5 dS/m), and Na+ content (13.4 cmol+/kg), but lower levels of organic matter and phosphorus compared to typical agricultural soils (NL, NS). These unfavorable conditions had a negative effect on lettuce growth, as both fresh and dry weights in the SL treatment (32.5 g and 0.39 g, respectively) were significantly lower than those in the NL treatment (40.4 g and 0.45 g). At the phylum level, Actinobacteria (51.6%) dominated the original reclaimed soil (SR), but after lettuce cultivation (SL), there was an increase in Cyanobacteria (25.3%) and Proteobacteria (29.4%). At the order level, Streptomycetales (35.2%) and Bacillales (13.5%) were predominant in SR, whereas in SL, Oscillatoriales (23.5%)—which have photosynthetic ability—as well as organic matter-degrading orders such as Rhodobacterales and Flavobacteriales, became dominant. For the eukaryotic community at the phylum level, Ascomycota was predominant in all samples; however, in NL, the relative proportions of Chlorophyta (22%) and Mucoromycota (8.9%) were higher, indicating increased diversity. At the order level, Eurotiales (28.5%), Hypocreales (20.2%), and Wallemiales (14.4%) were predominant in SR, but after lettuce cultivation, Wallemiales disappeared and Eurotiales increased to 40.0%. Additionally, Glomerellales and Sordariomycetes_o were detected only in SL and NL, suggesting that symbiotic fungal activity in the rhizosphere was promoted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: