The article explores modern approaches to land management automation through digital technologies. The main trends in the use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS), remote sensing (RS), and other innovative tools—such as blockchain and web technologies—are considered in terms of enhancing the efficiency of land resource management. Special attention is given to the challenges and prospects of digital transformation in this field, including legal and regulatory frameworks, infrastructure limitations, and workforce training needs. It is established that the digitalization of land management processes is a key factor in improving the efficiency of land resource governance, reducing bureaucratic barriers, and ensuring transparency in land relations. The main benefits of implementing digital technologies in land management practices are identified. These include the creation of accurate digital cadastral maps, land use scenario modeling, real-time land parcel change monitoring, data compatibility between agencies, optimization of land rights registration procedures, and improved citizen access to land information via electronic services. The article analyzes major challenges accompanying the digitalization process, such as insufficient infrastructure for processing large volumes of data, fragmented legal regulations governing land relations, the need to develop new data exchange standards, a shortage of next-generation professionals with advanced digital competencies in land management, and significant financial costs for implementing and maintaining modern technologies. Promising directions for the development of digital technologies to improve land resource management in Ukraine are substantiated. Emphasis is placed on the importance of integrating various digital platforms into a unified Open Data system, developing artificial intelligence methods for automated spatial data analysis and detection of land law violations, and enhancing international cooperation to share best practices and attract investment in digital land management technologies.
Stupen et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: