Mixed-methods approach evaluates accessibility in MOOCs, showing Moodle excels while Coursera better suits elderly users, implying design improvements are needed.
With technological advancements, Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have become widely adopted, supporting course management and content delivery. However, many platforms still face accessibility challenges due to inconsistent adherence to guidelines. This study evaluates the accessibility of Moodle and Coursera using WCAG 2.0, the WAVE tool, and Nielsen’s Heuristics. A mixed-methods approach combines qualitative and quantitative analyses. Results show that while Moodle demonstrates better overall accessibility, Coursera is more suitable for elderly and visually impaired users. This research contributes to digital accessibility and offers practical recommendations to enhance inclusion in MOOCs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sato et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: