Observational analysis shows improved oncologic outcomes in head and neck cancer patients with regionalized care, indicating a potential shift in treatment strategies.
Head and neck cancer are rare and require complex medical and surgical management. Regionalization or centralization of care, defined as the concentration of patients with complex diseases from a specific area in institutions with more experienced and highly functional multidisciplinary teams, may be an alternative to achieve better oncologic outcomes. To systematize the current knowledge regarding the centralization of care in head and neck oncology and its consequences in the practice of related surgeries. Currently, there is evidence that this strategy shows better oncologic outcomes in centers with greater volumes, greater adherence to evidence-based clinical guidelines and quality indicators, and a multidisciplinary team in charge of decision-making. The center in Ontario, Canada, is framed as an example of this strategy, achieving improved outcomes while maintaining a high level of quality. Although more high-quality studies are needed to support this strategy, we believe that the evidence already available is sufficient to consider it a valid option to improve the oncologic outcomes of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Castro et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: