PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 20, 2025The British Journal of Psychiatry29 citationsOpen Access

Warning: AI chatbots will soon dominate psychotherapy

View Full Paper
AFAllen Frances

Key Points

  • Psychotherapy chatbots display remarkable fluency and skill, yet their rise raises significant concerns over safety and efficacy.
  • Industry reports indicate these AI systems may dangerously mismanage severe mental health issues and foster addiction.
  • Assessment of chatbot therapy highlights both substantial benefits in accessibility and alarming risks like privacy invasion and misinformation.
  • As reliance on AI grows, human therapists must adapt training to address areas where chatbots are inadequate, focusing on the more seriously ill.

Abstract

Psychotherapy chatbots have attained remarkable fluency, skill and ubiquity – having become the single most frequent reason people use artificial intelligence. Their uncanny ability to engage and validate is a two-edged sword – useful for the majority of users who are experiencing problems of everyday life or have milder mental disorders, but dangerous for the minority who have more severe problems (e.g. psychosis, bipolar disorder, self-mutilation, suicide, antisocial impulses, eating disorders, conspiracy theories, religious and political extremism). Chatbots are created to make money, without meaningful quality control, safety guardrails and external regulation. They will likely be misused to create addiction, reduce human contact, invade privacy, allow exploitation and create opportunities for marketing and political propaganda. Chatbots also make mistakes (’hallucinations’), deceptively cover them up and sometimes go rogue (acting outside the parameters set by their human programmers). Psychotherapy practitioners and associations are curiously complacent about the rapid emergence of artificial intelligence competition. Their passivity reflects ignorance about the power of chatbots, denial of their likely impact and arrogance regarding their capacities (e.g. ‘no machine will ever replace me’). This is both incorrect and foolhardy – human therapists expect to win in competition for most healthier patients and must train or retrain to do things artificial intelligence does poorly – working with the more seriously ill and in settings and situations that are more idiosyncratic, chaotic or quickly changing. If we can’t work with artificial intelligence, we are likely to be replaced by it. I will describe: (a) benefits of chatbot therapy, (b) its terrifying dangers, (c) its likely impact on human therapy and training and 4) ways we can adapt to the artificial intelligence threat.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Allen Frances (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af4cebad7bf08b1ead6f14https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.10380
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Human-Human vs Human-AI Therapy: An Empirical Study2024 · 58 citations
  2. 2An Overview of Chatbot-Based Mobile Mental Health Apps: Insights From App Description and User Reviews2023 · 394 citations
  3. 3Delivering Cognitive Behavior Therapy to Young Adults With Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety Using a Fully Automated Conversational Agent (Woebot): A Randomized Controlled Trial2017 · 2,772 citations
  4. 4Artificial intelligence and increasing misinformation2023 · 195 citations
  5. 5The therapeutic effectiveness of artificial intelligence-based chatbots in alleviation of depressive and anxiety symptoms in short-course treatments: A systematic review and meta-analysis2024 · 160 citations