Empirical analysis reveals intersection of self-regulation and subjectness in diverse models, suggesting complex relationships.
The article attempts to correlate the phenomena of subjectness and self-regulation at the empirical level. As theoretical and empirical studies show, these phenomena are closely related. However, there is no unambiguous understanding of their relationship: is self-regulation part of subjectness, is it an independent phenomenon, or is there an intersection of the systems? Subjectness seems to us to be a more fundamental phenomenon; therefore, subjectness was not considered as part of self-regulation. In the empirical study, several alternative models were constructed and tested: 1) a model assuming that subjectness and self-regulation are a single phenomenon (a single-factor model); 2) a model assuming that self-regulation is a component of subjectness; 3) a model assuming that subjectness and self-regulation are two independent phenomena; 4) a model assuming a relationship between subjectness and self-regulation; 5) a model assuming an intersection of the systems, in which case subjectness uses certain properties of self-regulation, while self-regulation uses certain properties of subjectness, with both phenomena being understood as independent. Priority was given to the latter model. The models’ consistency with the empirical data was tested on a sample of 184 people aged 15 to 53 (M = 20.49, SD = 7.34), including 104 women and 80 men. These were mostly students of higher and secondary specialized educational institutions. The methods used were «The Development Level of a Person’s Subjectness» by M.A. Shchukina and the questionnaire «Behavior Self-Regulation Style – SSPM 2020» by V.I. Morosanova. The main statistical method was structural equation modeling. The intersecting systems model turned out to be most consistent with the data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kalugin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: