Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals the effect of x-ray incident position on energy resolution in transition-edge sensors, suggesting optimization of absorber structures.
We present the contribution of x-ray incident-position dependence on the absorber to the energy resolution of Ti/Au transition-edge sensors (TESs). The pulse height varies with the position due to insufficient thermal conductivity and geometry of the absorber that degrades the measured energy resolution. We develop a 3D electro-thermal simulation model and thoroughly study the position dependent contribution to energy resolution (∆E p ) for two presentative absorber structures: an absorber directly deposited on the center of TES sensor (design A) and an absorber cantilevered on the TES sensor by several stems (design B). For design A with a 30 μm×40 μm Au absorber ∆ E p is found to be 9.4 eV, while it is reduced to 1.35 eV for design B with a 100 μm×100 μm Au absorber. Although the contribution of position dependence is relatively small, this study facilitates further optimization of the absorber structure to achieve enhanced energy resolution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: