PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 14, 2025Cureus3 citationsOpen Access

Imaging Modalities for Differentiating Bone Infarction and Osteomyelitis in Sickle Cell Disease: A Literature Review

View Full Paper
AJAli JumaQSQasim M ShamtootMJM. Juma

Key Points

  • Accurate differentiation between bone infarction and osteomyelitis in sickle cell disease is crucial for effective treatment.
  • MRI and combined radionuclide imaging approaches show promising sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis.
  • The review evaluates imaging modalities including radiography, ultrasound, MRI, and radionuclide scans for their roles in diagnosis.
  • A multimodal approach is essential in correlating imaging findings with clinical assessment to avoid misdiagnoses.

Abstract

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a hereditary hemoglobinopathy associated with frequent acute and chronic skeletal complications. Among these, vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs)-induced bone infarctions and osteomyelitis are two critical yet clinically overlapping conditions that pose a diagnostic challenge. Accurate differentiation between the two is essential, as they require markedly different treatment strategies, conservative management for VOCs versus antibiotic therapy, and possible surgical intervention for osteomyelitis. This comparative review explores various imaging modalities' roles, advantages, and limitations, including plain radiography, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and radionuclide scans, such as bone and labeled leukocyte imaging. While no single modality has emerged as the gold standard, MRI and combined radionuclide approaches demonstrate promising sensitivity and specificity when interpreted alongside clinical and laboratory findings. This paper also highlights the limitations of various imaging techniques, underscores the necessity of correlating imaging findings with clinical data, and addresses the risk of misdiagnosis. A comprehensive understanding of the imaging characteristics of these complications is crucial for orthopedic surgeons, hematologists, radiologists, and infectious disease specialists involved in the care of patients with SCD. This review emphasizes a multimodal diagnostic approach tailored to the clinical context, aiming to guide clinicians in optimizing patient care for individuals with SCD presenting with acute bone pain.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Juma et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68af50a7ad7bf08b1ead8e2fhttps://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.90096
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Diagnostic evaluation and treatment of osteoarticular lesions in patients having sickle cell anemia: Literature review2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Indicators for Osteomyelitis in Children With Sickle Cell Disease Admitted With Vaso-Occlusive Crises2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Magnetic resonance imaging of a pediatric osteoarticular complication of sickle cell disease: Bone infarction associated with soft tissue collection2026
  4. 4Osteomyelitis Complicating Sickle Cell Disease2025
  5. 5Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Musculoskeletal Manifestations in Sickle Cell Disease2025