This analysis finds improved carbon stability and nutrient retention in manure biochar, revealing differences in effects based on pyrolysis methods.
Manure-derived biochar is a promising soil amendment, though its effectiveness is often constrained by limited structural stability and inconsistent nutrient retention. This study evaluated how the pyrolysis method (pre- vs. post-pyrolysis) and rate (5%, 10%, 20%, and 30% w/w) of bentonite incorporation influence the physicochemical properties, nutrient availability, and carbon stability of manure-derived biochar. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analyses revealed that pre-pyrolysis addition enhanced mineral integration, with silicon and aluminum contents increasing by up to 500% and 600%, respectively, while carbon content decreased by up to 34%. Water holding capacity (WHC) improved by approximately 102% with 5–10% bentonite, and carbon stability more than doubled (≥100% increase) at moderate application rates under pre-pyrolysis treatment. However, nitrate (NO3−) and potassium (K) availability declined by up to 89% and 47%, respectively, in pre-pyrolysis treatments due to strong nutrient immobilization. In contrast, post-pyrolysis bentonite addition increased NO3− by ~44% and K by ~29%, while phosphorus (P) availability rose by 133% at 30% bentonite. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed a clear distinction between pre- and post-pyrolysis bentonite-treated biochar. Pre-pyrolysis treatments were linked to higher pH, WHC, and carbon stability, while post-pyrolysis treatments were associated with greater nutrient availability (e.g., NO3−, and K levels) and higher EC. These findings underscore the importance of the pyrolysis method, showing that pre-pyrolysis bentonite incorporation strengthens biochar’s structural integrity and long-term carbon sequestration potential, whereas post-pyrolysis addition enhances immediate nutrient availability. This duality enables the development of targeted biochar formulations tailored to specific agronomic needs—whether for sustained soil improvement or rapid fertility enhancement in climate-smart and sustainable land management systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rupngam et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: