Observational study quantifies risks of non-fatal major cardiovascular events and mortality in obstructive sleep apnoea, indicating that PAP therapy may reduce these risks.
Rationale Evidence regarding the efficacy of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy in reducing the risks of non-fatal major cardiovascular events (NF-MACE) and mortality in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) remains controversial. Objectives This study aims to quantify the impact of PAP therapy on these risks and develop a predictive risk estimator. Methods We conducted a multicentre, observational, prospective study involving 5358 individuals diagnosed with OSA, with a median follow-up of 14 years (IQR 10–15 years). We derived and validated a risk estimator of NF-MACE (including myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularisation procedures, and congestive heart failure) and all-cause mortality, incorporating PAP adherence alongside clinical and sleep-related data. Results The cohort's mean ( sd ) for age was 55±11 years, the Body Mass Index 32.0±5.4 Kg·m −2 , and an apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI) of 35 (±22) events/hour; 26% were females, and 1467 (37%) were PAP adherent. Over the follow-up period, 754 participants experienced NF-MACE, while 858 deaths were recorded. Significant predictors included prior cardiovascular events, non-HDL cholesterol ≥200 mg·dL −1 , COPD diagnosis, AHI >30 events/hr, and age >60 years. PAP adherence was protective (OR 0.46; 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.56), and the absolute risk reduction varied depending on the baseline risk (median of 16%, IQR 12–18). The risk estimator yielded an AUROC of 0.75 and a Brier score of 0.17, with 64% sensitivity and 75% specificity. Conclusions PAP therapy is associated with long-term risk reduction of NF-MACE and mortality in OSA patients, while the developed risk estimator enhances clinical decision-making regarding therapy initiation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Divo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: