Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis assesses outcomes of durvalumab and tremelimumab in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with MASLD, indicating potential comparable efficacy across liver disease types.
Aim This study aimed to evaluate the association between the efficacy of durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Dur/Tre) and metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods A total of 239 patients with HCC who received Dur/Tre between March 2023 and October 2024 at multiple institutions in Japan were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into three groups based on underlying liver disease: viral‐related HCC ( n = 126), MASLD‐related HCC ( n = 30), and nonviral, non‐MASLD HCC ( n = 83). Results The overall response rates (ORR) were 17.5%, 16.7%, and 19.3% in viral‐related HCC, MASLD‐related HCC, and nonviral, non‐MASLD HCC, respectively. The disease control rates (DCR) were 44.4%, 46.7%, and 51.8%, respectively. No significant differences in ORR ( p = 0.6) or DCR ( p = 0.9) were observed among the three groups. The median PFS was 3.7 months (95% CI, 2.8–4.9) in patients with viral‐related HCC, 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.3–4.8) in patients with MASLD‐related HCC, and 4.4 months (95% CI, 2.6–5.8) in patients with nonviral, non‐MASLD HCC. The median OS was 14.4 months (95% CI, 9.8–NA) in patients with viral‐related HCC and 11.0 months (95% CI, 6.4–NA) in patients with MASLD‐related HCC, whereas it was not reached in patients with nonviral, non‐MASLD HCC. No statistically significant differences in PFS ( p = 1.0) and OS ( p = 0.3) were found among the groups. Conclusions Dur/Tre showed comparable efficacy in MASLD‐related HCC and other etiologies, warranting confirmation in larger cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hatanaka et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: