This analysis assesses the safety and immunological effects of recombinant canine interleukin-15 in Beagle dogs, suggesting its potential for subcutaneous administration.
Abstract Interleukin-15 (IL-15) is a cytokine critical to the activation and maintenance of natural killer (NK) cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes. In veterinary medicine, recombinant canine IL-15 (rcIL-15) has emerged as a potential immunotherapeutic agent; however, limited information is available on its safety and efficacy when administered subcutaneously (SC) compared to the intravenous (IV) route. This study aimed to determine whether SC administration of rcIL-15 provides comparable safety and immunological effects to IV administration in Beagle dogs, and to identify an optimal SC dosing regimen. Three male Beagle dogs were sequentially administered rcIL-15 at 20 µg/kg/day via IV and SC routes for four consecutive days. Subsequently, SC doses of 40 and 60 µg/kg/day were tested in the same dogs. Clinical assessments were conducted throughout the study. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected before treatment and on day 7 post-treatment for flow cytometric analysis of lymphocyte subsets. All dogs tolerated rcIL-15 well, with no adverse effects or injection site reactions observed, even at the highest SC dose (60 µg/kg/day), which was threefold higher than the standard IV dose. Flow cytometric analysis showed increased frequencies of CD3⁺CD5⁺low, Nkp46⁺CD5⁺low, and non-B non-T cells, indicating NK cell activation. CD8⁺CD5⁺low NK-like T cells were consistently increased, whereas CD4⁺CD5⁺ T cell responses were variable. SC administration at 40 and 60 µg/kg/day elicited immunological responses comparable to those observed with IV administration. These findings suggest that SC delivery of rcIL-15 is well tolerated and induces immune activation similar to IV administration, suggesting the need for further investigation for its clinical applicability in canine immunotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: