This research demonstrates the CO2 storage potential in saline aquifers, highlighting the importance of monitoring injection pressures.
To reduce CO2 emissions, CO2 geological storage is recognized as an effective approach to decrease atmospheric carbon concentration. Sequestration in deep saline aquifers has become a research focus. However, the physicochemical property changes in saline formations induced by CO2 injection remain unclear, making it difficult to assess their CO2 storage potential. This study focuses on saline aquifers within the Jurassic Badaowan formation (J1b), Sangonghe formation (J1s), and Cretaceous Tugulu Group (K1tg) of the Baijiahai Uplift in the Junggar Basin. An integrated methodology combining laboratory experiments—including CO2 static immersion tests, dynamic displacement tests, X-ray diffraction (XRD), mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements, and mechanical testing—with CMG-based numerical modeling was employed to analyze CO2 storage mechanisms and evaluate storage potential. The results show that after CO2 immersion, extensive dissolution of calcite in J1s, clay swelling/cementation in J1b, and extensive dissolution of calcite in K1tg all lead to increased porosity and permeability, with the J1b formation exhibiting superior CO2 storage capacity, the highest MICP-derived porosity, and the greatest NMR-measured porosity among the three formations. Numerical simulations further confirmed J1b’s leading sequestration volume. Based on integrated experimental and simulation results, the J1b formation is identified as the optimal reservoir for CO2 storage. However, to manage potential mechanical instability during real-world injection scenarios, injection pressures and rates should be carefully controlled and continuously monitored to avoid formation fracturing and ensure long-term storage security. This study provides a reference for implementing saline aquifer CCUS projects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: