Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals energy and exergy efficiency trends in a milk pasteurization system, indicating impacts of geothermal source temperature.
This study investigates the exergoeconomic performance of a milk pasteurization system powered by geothermal energy, operating across geothermal source temperatures (GSTs) ranging from 80 °C to 110 °C. The system uses geothermal heat as its primary energy source, while the cooling process is supported by a vapor compression refrigeration cycle driven by electricity generated through an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC). The analysis was carried out in three stages: determining system parameters for each GST level, conducting detailed energy and exergy analyses, and performing an exergoeconomic evaluation using the specific exergy costing (SPECO) method. The results show that both energy and exergy efficiencies decline as GST increases. Energy efficiency varies between 88.30% and 78.53%, while exergy efficiency ranges from 72.86% to 58.02%. In parallel, unit-specific manufacturing costs increase with higher GST. Electricity production costs range from 610 to 900 USD·MWh−1, and the cost of pasteurized milk varies between 3.76 and 6.53 USD·ton−1. These findings offer practical insights into how geothermal source temperature affects the thermodynamic and economic performance of such systems, contributing to the broader understanding of sustainable dairy processing technologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akkurt et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: