This research tailors systems engineering methods for attitude and orbit control in small satellites, highlighting coordination in distributed missions.
This research proposes a tailored Systems Engineering (SE) design process for the development of Attitude and Orbit Control Systems (AOCS) for small satellites operating in formation. These missions, known as Distributed Spacecraft Missions (DSMs), involve groups of satellites—commonly referred to as satellite constellations—whose primary objective is to maintain controlled relative positioning in three dimensions. In these configurations, each satellite may serve a specific role. For instance, one may act as a navigation reference, while another functions as a communication relay. These roles support synchronized control and ensure mission cohesion. To achieve precise relative positioning, the system must integrate specialized sensors and maintain continuous inter-satellite communication. This capability enables precise navigation across both the space and ground segments, while ensuring high control accuracy. As such, the development of AOCS must be approached as a complex systems challenge, involving the coordinated behavior of multiple autonomous elements working toward a shared mission objective. This study tailors the SE process using the ISO/IEC 15288 standard and incorporates a Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) approach to enhance traceability, consistency, and architectural coherence throughout the system lifecycle. As a result, it proposes a customized SE process for AOCS development that begins in the mission’s conceptual phase and addresses the specific functional and operational demands of formation flying. A conceptual example illustrates the proposed process. It focuses on subsystem coordination, communication needs, and the architecture required to support an AOCS for autonomous satellite formations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barón et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: