Based on fundamental mechanics, movement and force associate head and pelvic movement asymmetry with asymmetry of force production. We investigate, how often racehorses undergoing strenuous training regimens show evidence of switching between “preferred” limbs, i.e. one limb producing increased force, when assessed at monthly intervals? We hypothesize that clinical asymmetry thresholds designed for “detecting lameness” are frequently exceeded and that when applying previously established Thoroughbred-specific repeatability values, horses rarely switch between showing left- and right-sided asymmetry. Monthly gait assessments (inertial sensors) were conducted in 256 Thoroughbred racehorses at least twice per horse (up to 16 times per horse). Descriptive statistics for absolute differences for head and pelvic movement were compared to published Thoroughbred-specific repeatability values. The percentage of left–right switches between repeat assessments was calculated in comparison to three different levels of pre-defined thresholds (perfect symmetry, clinical lameness thresholds, previously established Thoroughbred-specific repeatability values) and switch frequencies compared between the three thresholds. Ranges containing 95% of monthly differences were higher than published daily and weekly values except for pelvic vertical range of motion. Approximately 30% of monthly differences in individual symmetry parameters showed left–right switches around “perfect symmetry”. Utilizing clinical lameness thresholds for categorizing left–right switches, a significantly (p < 0.001) reduced percentage of 4–11% of measurements for head movement and 7–17% for pelvic movement showed switches. Using daily repeatability values for categorization, a further significantly (p < 0.001) reduced percentage of switches was observed: 0.3–3.6% for head movement and 0.6–7.0% for pelvic movement. While racehorses in training regularly switch between small left- or right-sided movement symmetries, they less frequently switch between more pronounced left- and right-sided movement symmetries defined based on daily variations. Further studies should investigate the reasons for these rare switches.
Pfau et al. (Wed,) studied this question.