Retrospective study finds mugwort sensitization and asthma as key predictors of anaphylactic shock in children, indicating potential early intervention strategies.
Introduction Food-induced anaphylactic shock is the most severe and life-threatening manifestation of food allergy in children. However, its underlying risk factors remain poorly defined, especially in pediatric populations. This study aimed to identify independent predictors of food-induced anaphylactic shock by analyzing clinical and immunological data from a tertiary hospital in Northern China. Methods This retrospective study included 68 children (aged 0–16 years) hospitalized for food-induced anaphylaxis at Peking University Third Hospital from May 2018 to May 2025. Demographic data, clinical manifestations, serum-specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) levels, and comorbidities were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of anaphylactic shock. Results Of 68 patients with food-induced anaphylaxis, 14 (20.6%) experienced anaphylactic shock, with 78.6% of these cases occurring in children older than six years. Wheat and fruits were the most common triggers in the shock group (each 28.6%). Subgroup analysis revealed that 88.9% (8/9) of plant-food-triggered shock cases specifically clustered from April to October, aligning with mugwort pollen season. sIgE levels to inhalant allergens, especially mugwort, were significantly higher in the shock group ( P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, mugwort sensitization (sIgE levels exceeding 2.83 kU/L, OR = 9.91, 95% CI: 1.27–77.31, P = 0.029) and comorbid asthma (OR = 8.11, 95% CI: 1.29–50.98, P = 0.026) were identified as independent predictors of anaphylactic shock. Conclusions Mugwort sensitization and asthma are independent risk factors for food-induced anaphylactic shock in children. Early identification of these risk markers may support early risk stratification and seasonal dietary interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: