This approach shows the enhanced conductivity models in peat soil through GPR data, indicating better geological interpretations.
3D frequency domain electromagnetic induction (FD-EMI) surveying consists in using a profile spacing, which is smaller than the cross-line footprint of the measurements. Using portable multi-configuration loop-loop sensors, this approach can image the spatial distribution of electrical conductivity in the shallow subsurface with a relatively high lateral resolution. A pseudo-3D sharp inversion procedure (spatially constrained 1D inversion) can be improved by using further constraints like structural prior information obtained from 3D ground-penetrating radar (GPR) surveying. Two field examples show how both structural and model sharpness constraints yield to improved pseudo-3D models compared to models as obtained from more classical approaches (e.g., non-structurally constrained and based on smoothness constraints). These results also highlight the non-uniqueness of the resulting FD-EMI conductivity models, which can critically influence the following interpretation in terms of geological units and petrophysical properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klose et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: