Observational study shows improved pain management in dogs with pancreatitis using a wearable device, indicating effective outpatient care.
Background Inpatient management for pancreatitis might be costly. Hypothesis/Objectives Describe a standardized outpatient protocol for pancreatitis. Animals Nineteen client‐owned dogs. Methods Single‐arm prospective observational study. Inclusion criteria included ≥ 2 clinical signs of pancreatitis, an abnormal SNAP cPL, no evidence of mechanical obstruction, and no significant comorbidities. All dogs received: fuzapladib (0.4 mg/kg IV q24 h for 3 days), subcutaneous fluids (up to 20 mL/kg/d SQ), hydromorphone (0.01 mg/kg/h delivered by a wearable infusion device), anti‐emetics (maropitant citrate &/or ondansetron), and nutrition. Dogs were assessed every 24 h for 3 days via physical examination and calculation of modified clinical activity index (MCAI; indicator of severity) and Glasgow composite measure pain scale (GCMPS) scores (indicator of analgesic adequacy). Results Ten of 19 dogs had a Spec cPL ≥ 400 μg/L and were considered to have suspected pancreatitis. Nine dogs had an abnormal SNAP cPL but Spec cPL < 400 μg/L and were reported in the assessment of protocol complications only. In the suspected pancreatitis group, MCAI decreased from Day 0 to Day 2 (median: 6, IQR: 5, vs. median 3, IQR: 4.25). GCMPS decreased from Day 0 to Day 2 (median: 7.5, IQR: 7.75, vs. median 0, IQR: 2.75). 2/19 dogs were hospitalized, 1 dog due to relapsed clinical signs, and 1 dog at the owner's request. A cutaneous adverse reaction could not be ruled out in 1 dog. Conclusions and Clinical Importance In this non‐blinded study, most dogs were successfully treated on an outpatient basis. Mild to moderate cases of pancreatitis predominated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Erger et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: