This analysis reveals how comedic elements in Pamela involve rape jokes, suggesting ethical implications of laughter.
This article examines Samuel Richardson’s use of the joke as a structuring principle in Pamela . Long recognized as a “comedy” in the traditional sense of the word—a genre ending in marriage—I argue that the novel’s frequent scenes of near-rape and sexual coercion can be read as “jokes,” structurally aligned through their use of comedic reversal with the category of the rape joke. I interrogate Richardson’s use of the joke structure, attempting to identify what the ethical implications of such structurally induced laughter might be. At core, I seek to introduce a novel way of reading texts through the structural lens of the joke and to show how Pamela functions in gist as a “wicked jest,” both tantalizing and teasing its reader into an ethically problematic response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nina Elisabeth Cook (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: